Webinar recording

LawY for New Zealand lawyers

This webinar is for New Zealand LEAP users looking to enhance their efficiency using LawY. Hear from Alana Ashe, GM of Operations in NZ, explore powerful ways to save time with LawY, and dive into the principles of ethical and effective use of AI.

Recorded: 30th July, 2025

The unique way LawY works

LawY's unique blend of cutting-edge AI, human legal expertise, and thoughtful features gives your firm a real advantage. Here's an overview of how it works:

LawY offers you flexible tools to help you move quickly or take your legal research further. In addition to powerful instant AI-answers, we've also introduced Rapid & Deep Research.

Tips for creating prompts

Prompts are the instructions you provide to an AI to perform a certain action. We also refer to the prompts more simply as the legal questions you want to ask LawY.

Effective prompting starts by carefully considering the legal question you're addressing. First, clearly identify the issues involved, and second, determine the applicable legal principles. Use LawY to find the relevant principles, cases, primary sources, and concepts. The key is being specific and clear.

That’s why we encourage you to experiment—ask questions, explore the limits, and adapt. If a response isn’t quite right, revise the prompt and try again. This approach not only improves results but also builds AI literacy.

Overview of questions used the webinar

Here are the prompts and follow-up questions we used:

Prompt 1

I'm a lawyer who acts for a client who has just ended a de facto relationship of approximately 15 years my client is concerned about her spouse who settled a discretionary family trust with himself and his brothers as trustee shortly before the relationship or at the start of the relationship this trust now holds the matrimonial home the home was purchased by my client's de facto spouse about two years prior to the relationship using a mix of inherited funds and personal savings our client has instructed me to commence proceedings please prepare a checklist it should be concise about eight to ten points for example it should start with the letter to the X spouses solicitor seeking disclosure of the trust documents this would probably then followed by the letter of advice to a client

Prompt 2

Start step one

Prompt 3

Expand the list to include the additional items required for the proper exchange of full and frank disclosure do these in a separate headings as well as a separate heading for the trust request set out a section that we expect them to act in good faith and that we need a response within 14 days

Prompt 4

Please now draft a letter to the client providing a visual initial advice in relation to the clients de facto trust spouses particularly that the matrimony home was transferred into the trust just before they moved in together we donate this stage have sufficient information in relation to that trust and an unaware of the trust expenditure and that will need to consider any material that may be provided by the client and the other side solicitor the letter I don't want to refer to the direct references to case law but should refer to relevant legislation and sections for any potential claims that we may have explain this in a manner suitable for a layperson in law but sophisticated otherwise

Prompt 5

Amend and include in that letter and expand upon what the potential claims are and how the court might deal with them please set out what we need in relation to our own clients disclosure as well as any information has relating to the operation of the trust we should also enclose a copy of the draft letter to the other side solicitor for her review and approval we also will need a section for her to attend the office and discuss any material the conduct of this matter please also use headings for any references to potential claims and sections otherwise update the letter appropriately

Prompt 6

Please set out any relevant case law in relation to possible claims under section 44 dispositions to defeat claims

Prompt 7

Please drop a memorandum to a solicitor in my firm to conduct a review of the cases from this conversation confirming relevance and the principles are still followed as well as confirming any relevant updated cases should be made clear in the memorandum that these cases were generated from the use of an AI tool

Prompt 8

Please give me more information on Sutton V Bell including any quotes use exact words from the judgment in support of the courts reasoning https://www.nzlii.org/cgi-bin/sinodisp/nz/cases/NZSC/2023/65.html

Prompt 9

Please expand the letter to the client taking into consideration the courts perspective in Sutton V Bell particularly in light of the uncertainty regarding whether the transfer of the matrimonial home and to trust occurred before or after the commencement of the relationship and how the court's reasoning will impact that it appears to transfer its likely completely shortly before the parties began living together but likely when that started their relationship please ensure that the letter addresses these points without specifically referring to the case

Prompt 10

Now please set up a follow up and checklist to do in relation to this conversation

Prompt 11

Today is the 30th of July 2025 New Zealand Standard Time I want to send the letter of advice out to the client by closing business Friday as such I will also then need to draft a letter to the solicitor that needs to be finished please include dates and times as relevant to this where there are no specific dates suggest dates or include them as a placeholder in the to do list

Prompt 12

Please do a legal file note of only the work done in this conversation it's important to make clear that the file note and the working material referred to in this file note was prepared with the assistance of an AI tool this should be included at the start and where appropriate elsewhere

Ethical and effective use of LawY

Important things to remember

  • LawY is a research tool that provides a springboard for your legal work
  • We cannot provide legal advice, as AI cannot replace the role and expertise of a lawyer
  • Only a lawyer can apply the legal principles to the nuanced and complex facts of the matter
  • Your legal work is non delegable: ensure to review, understand, and check all AI-answers
  • AI is finding its way into the courtroom in more ways than one
  • We have ethical obligation as lawyers to consider

Cases and resources mentioned

  • University of Melbourne and KPMG, 'Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence, A global study 2025'
  • 'Entering the Hall of Hallucinations: AI, Law, and Global Verification Failures', Dr Jason Harkess, 19 May 2025
  • Ayinde v Haringey & Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank & Ors [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin)
  • Wikeley v Kea Investments Ltd [2024] NZCA 609
  • LMN v STC [2025] NZEmpC 46
  • Kohls et al v. Ellison et al 0:24-cv-03754

Practical tips

  • Get hands-on with AI tools to build real literacy. You can’t understand an AI system’s strengths and limits by reading a policy. You need to actually use the tools—test them, push them, even break them a little. That’s how you learn where they’re helpful, where they fail, and where your judgment needs to step in.
  • Training that’s practical, not abstract. Teach lawyers how to spot hallucinated citations. Show them how to test AI output against primary sources.
  • Mandatory verification protocols. If an AI tool has been used in document drafting or research, there should be a clear requirement to verify before it leaves the building. This could be as simple as a checkbox in your document management system or a flag in your template.
  • Designated AI champions within legal teams. People who stay across developments in tools, model behaviours, and help others use AI well—safely and effectively.
  • Integrate AI checkpoints into workflows. Don't bolt them on. Bake them into the way teams work: pre-filing reviews, affidavit verification, expert brief vetting—wherever the risk is highest.
  • And maybe most importantly, normalise the discussion. If someone says, “Hey, this case doesn’t look right,” that shouldn’t be an awkward moment—it should be standard practice.

In summary

  • AI won’t make you a great lawyer but not understanding it could eventually make you less effective
  • Additionally, a lack of AI literacy may also prevent you from recognising inappropriate or unsafe AI use
  • Embracing AI is no longer optional—it’s critical for enhancing efficiency
  • Staying informed allows you to help shape AI’s role in promoting fairness, accountability, and justice
"Within strict risk management parameters, my young team and I have embraced AI fully and it enhances our work daily. Quicker justice is a win for all. Thank you LEAP Legal Software and LawY!" — Aina Khan OBE

Additional resources

Webinar resources mentioned

Links to Online Cases

Template for an AI-use policy

How to use Windows Dictation

Blog post: The secret to powerful and effective AI prompts

Become a trusted Verifier

We are always looking to expand our panel of trusted lawyers-in-the-loop. Earn your hourly rate to complete verification work, which involves reviewing AI-answers in LawY and making changes where necessary. This is a unique and paid opportunity to shape the future of legal AI.

Find out more about eligibility and register your interest here

Explore AI resources for lawyers

We regularly publish guides and industry news on our blog, along with content going behind-the-scenes in the platform.

Read the LawY blog

Discover the latest in LawY

We're introducing new and improved features to support your legal research, every step of the way. Whether you need lightning-fast responses and case summaries to get started, or tools to dig deeper with clarity and confidence, LawY is here to help.

Explore Rapid & Deep Research